Which of the following allows a will executed in another state to be admitted to probate?

The correct response highlights that for a will executed in another state to be admissible to probate, it must be in accordance with the laws of the state where it was executed or where the testator was domiciled at the time of their death. This principle recognizes the validity of a will that conforms to the legal requirements present in the location that either directly oversees the execution of the document or where the testator had established their legal residence.

This understanding aligns with the concept of testamentary formalities, which stipulates that each jurisdiction has specific requirements regarding how a will must be signed, witnessed, and declared. If the will satisfies these criteria, it is seen as valid within that jurisdiction, promoting the intention of the testator regarding the distribution of their estate.

Other options reference different jurisdictions or requirements that might not universally apply or recognize the testator's rights. For example, the requirement that the will must comply with the law of the state where the property is located may lead to inconsistencies, particularly in cases involving multiple jurisdictions. Similarly, notarization by a legal representative is not universally a requirement for the validity of wills and may not address the core principles governing probate admissions in various states.