Which statement accurately describes an invalid will?

The statement that describes an invalid will accurately states that it has no legal effect on property distribution. When a will is deemed invalid, it means that the document does not meet the legal requirements necessary for a will to be recognized, such as proper execution, signature, or capacity of the testator. Consequently, because it lacks validity, the provisions specified in the will cannot be enforced, and the deceased person's assets will not be distributed according to that document. Instead, the distribution of the estate will typically follow the laws of intestacy, which dictate how assets are allocated when there is no valid will in place. This principle underscores the fundamental nature of wills in estate planning, as they are intended to provide clear directives for asset distribution after death.

The other options suggest misunderstandings about the nature of validity in wills. For instance, saying the will must be fully rewritten to become valid again doesn't recognize that certain steps, like proper witnessing or amending, may rectify issues without entirely rewriting the document. The idea that an invalid will can be contested implies that there might be a legal standing to argue for its validity, which contradicts the very definition of an invalid will. Lastly, the notion that an invalid will only affects the distribution of specific assets overlooks the fact that